Norton v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

We have examined with interest appellant’s extended motion for rehearing. He first insists that we erred in not upholding his complaint of the admission of the testimony of State witness Alderson, in effect, that he had the exclusive care, management and control of the leased land from which the State claimed the alleged stolen pipe was taken. Appellant cites Bailey v. State, 18 Texas App., 426; Staha v. State, 151 S. W., 543; Burges v. State, 26 S. W. (2d) 229; Daggett v. State, 44 S. W., 148; Henshaw v. State, 39 S. W. (2d) 624. We are in accord with…