Legal Opinion

People v. Kinard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for writ of coram nobis denied, without costs. Memorandum: Defendant seeks coram nobis relief in this court claiming that he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of appellate counsel on his direct appeal (People v Kinard, 67 AD2d 1111, lv denied 46 NY2d 944). At the outset, we must resolve the issue of whether this is the proper court to entertain defendant’s application. To date the Court of Appeals has expressed no view on this issue (see, People ex rel. Douglas v Vincent, 50 NY2d 901, 903). The Second Department in People v Ramos (108 AD2d 209) and the Third…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. People ex rel. Douglas v. VincentNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mauro Caballero v. John P. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. McCool v. New York StateDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API