Legal Opinion
Antonio Fernandez v. Narinder Singh Golen
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 4, 2020No. 5:19-cv-01086Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Case No. 5:19-cv-01086-ODW (SHKx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 14 NARINDER SINGH GOLEN; DEFAULT JUDGMENT [23] SAMARINDER SINGH, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez moves for entry of default judgment (“Motion”) 19 against Defendants Narinder Singh Golen (“Singh Golen”) and Samarinder Singh 20 (“Singh”) for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (See 21 generally Appl. for Default J. (“Mot.”),…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.