Legal Opinion

Schafler v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 26, 1998No. Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 24158-96UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEPI SCHAFLER, F.K.A PEPI SUMMER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Schafler v. Commissioner

Tax Ct. Dkt. No. 24158-96

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1998-86; 1998 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 86; 75 T.C.M. (CCH) 1897;

February 26, 1998, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Pepi Schafler, pro se.

Roger Bracken, for respondent.

PANUTHOS, CHIEF SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE.

PANUTHOS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PANUTHOS, CHIEF SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A(b)(3) and Rules 180, 181, and 182. 1 Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Crocker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henao v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2016
  2. McGuirl v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API