Legal Opinion

Wood v. Jones

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Polk. Tried below before the Hon. J. The material facts are clearly indicated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

Martha Wood, one of the defendants below, has brought this cause here by writ of error, and assigns the following as errors of the court below, for which he seeks to reverse the judgment :

1. The court erred in overruling her general and special exceptions to plaintiff’s petition.

2. The court erred in its charge to the jury.

3. The court erred in refusing to give the charges asked by defendant.

4. The court erred in overruling defendants’ motion for a new trial.

It appears from the pleadings, that Isham T. Patrick, George T. Wood and John F. Carr bought an equal third interest in several tracts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neatherly v. RipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Dugan's Heirs v. Colville's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. OwsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ryan v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Leonard v. Cleburne Roller Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Baker v. WiswellNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ryan v. LoftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API