Legal Opinion

Melissa Ramirez v. Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 28, 2017No. 17-1221 & 17-1226PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.

The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), Pub. L. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), extends federal jurisdiction to “mass actions.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll). One mandatory characteristic of a mass action is a proposal by more than one hundred persons to try their claims jointly. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll)(B)(i). However, cases that are consolidated or coordinated only for pretrial purposes are explicitly exempted from CAFA’s mass action provision, and thus are not removable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll)(B)(ii)(IV). The question before us on appeal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Geoffrey Scimone v. Carnival CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Morgan v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Teague v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Brian Adams v. 3M CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. Adams v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
  4. Banks v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
  5. Combs v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API