Melissa Ramirez v. Vintage Pharmaceuticals LLC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), Pub. L. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), extends federal jurisdiction to “mass actions.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll). One mandatory characteristic of a mass action is a proposal by more than one hundred persons to try their claims jointly. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll)(B)(i). However, cases that are consolidated or coordinated only for pretrial purposes are explicitly exempted from CAFA’s mass action provision, and thus are not removable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(ll)(B)(ii)(IV). The question before us on appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Geoffrey Scimone v. Carnival CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Morgan v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Teague v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Andrews v. CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Brian Adams v. 3M CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Adams v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Banks v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Combs v. 3M CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.