Legal Opinion

Cumberland Coal Co. v. Sherman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to set aside summons, complaint, and all proceedings for want of jurisdiction. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSutherland, J.

This action was commenced by the service •of a summons and complaint on the defendants Sherman and Dean personally, and upon the president and one of the directors of the Hoffman Steam Coal Company, in the city of New York. The plaintiff and the defendants—the Hoffman Company—are both foreign corporations, organized under the laws •of, and in the State of Maryland. Since the commencement of the action, S. Brook Postly has been made a party defendant by supplemental complaint. The defendants Sherman, Dean, •and Postly are, and were, when the action was commenced, all residents of the State of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Motor Co. v. . ReavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Dailey Motor Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Crowley v. Royal Exchange Shipping Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  4. Ogdensburgh & Champlain Railroad v. Vermont & Canada RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API