Attorney General v. Crocker
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.
This is an information in the nature of a quo warranta to try the title of the respondents, respectively, to the offices of town clerk and selectmen of the town of Montague, which it is alleged they have usurped. The facts, as they appear from the report of the single justice of this court who heard the case, are as follows:
At the annual town meeting on March 3, 1884, a moderator was duly chosen and tellers were duly appointed by him to aid in checking the names of the voters and in assorting and counting the votes, according to the St. of 1883, e. 229. After the votes for town officers,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Fowler v. BebeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Commonwealth v. FowlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Petersilea v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Morrison v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Commonwealth v. DiStasioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- State v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Kilroy v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Attorney General v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.