Legal Opinion

Hall v. Simmons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1991No. 386PA89PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The question before us is whether a contractor whose license expires during construction and is not renewed within the sixty days preceding invalidation pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 87-10 1 may recover the costs of materials and labor supplied during that period. We hold that he may.

In his complaint plaintiff alleged he had entered into an agreement with defendants on 24 June 1985 to provide labor and materials and to construct a residence for cost plus ten percent. Estimated cost was .$74,000. Plaintiff alleged he had initiated construction 18 June 1985 and in every respect had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Brady v. FulghumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Arnold Const. Co., Inc. v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Sample v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Urbatec, a California Corporation v. Yuma County, an Arizona CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark v. Sanger Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In re A.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. RCDI Construction, Inc. v. Spaceplan/Architecture, Planning & Interiors, P.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
  4. Ron Medlin Construction v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. BAKER CONST. CO., INC. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API