Legal Opinion

Stoisits v. Lehigh & New England Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1940No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

In the latter part of April, 1935, Stefan Stoisits, claimant-appellant herein, was operated upon by Dr. Roland W. Bachman, at a hospital in Allentown, for the correction of a bilateral hernia. Replying to an inquiry relative to the purpose of the operation, the doctor testified: “A direct incomplete inguinal hernia on the left side. It was a peculiar thing about this hernia, he had a distinct split in the fascia and this did not come down through the external ring but the entire floor of the inguinal canal was split and he had an inguinal hernia protruding there about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Gardner v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Pollock v. Clairton School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Hopp v. Taub (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. James J. Skelly, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API