Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 8, 1930No. A-7641PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the district court of Hughes county, of the crime of grand larceny, and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the penitentiary at McAlester. From which judgment and sentence the defendant, after perfecting the record, appealed to this court.

The substance of the state’s evidence is as follows: Julia Scott stated she knew the defendant, Russ Hatfield; she lost a calf on or about February 26, 1929; she did not know whether the hide found in the field of the defendant was the hide from her calf, as she did not see the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Pettigrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Slater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API