American Cyanamid Co. v. Marzall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Froth flotation was well known to the prior art. This is not disputed. The appellant’s assignors put froth flotation to practical and successful use in the elimination of contaminants or solid particles from lubricating and cooling emulsions, called lubricating or emulsion coolants. The District Court in an action filed by-appellant pursuant to Rev.Stat. § 4915 (1878), as amended, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, found that the discovery of this new usefulness of froth flotation did not amount to patentable invention and dismissed the action. The effect was to leave undisturbed the Patent Office decision…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. CarySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beck v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958