Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 29, 2017No. 130280CR; A157561Published

1Per curiam

This case is a companion case to State v. Tapp, 284 Or App 583, 393 P3d 262 (2017), decided today. Defendant was a codefendant with the defendant in Tapp and joined in the motion to suppress filed by the defendant in Tapp. The trial court denied the motion and, in a bench trial, convicted defendant (as well as the defendant in Tapp) of one count of unlawful delivery of marijuana for consideration, ORS 475.860, and one count of unlawful possession of marijuana, ORS 475.864. On appeal, defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress, which, as noted, was the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API