Legal Opinion

Lockert v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1999No. 25A03-9810-CR-449PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge

Charles E. Lockert brings this interlocutory appeal from the denial of his third motion for speedy trial.

Lockert raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court’s denial of Lockert’s third motion for speedy trial violated Ind.Crim. Rule 4(B)(1). ■

II. Whether Lockert’s right to a speedy trial under- Atiele I, § 12 of the Indiana Constitution or the Sixth Amendment of .the U.S. Constitution has been violated.

We affirm and remand with instructions.

In August, 1974, Lockert was charged with first degree murder, felony murder, accessory after the fact…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Wheeler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Rivers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Lockert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API