Legal Opinion

McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. First Texas Chemical Manufacturing Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 11, 1947No. 5234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Appellee, First Texas Chemical Manufacturing Co.,’filed application in the United States Patent Office for the registration of its trademark “ORA-CEL”, allegedly used in connection with the sale of a. vitamin preparation.

*878McKesson & Robbins, Incorporated, appellant, filed a notice of opposition against the application, based upon its ownership and registration of two trade-marks, “ORA” and “ORAFORM”, used since 1927 and 1915 respectively, the first for a deodorant and the latter for throat-pastils.

The Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences sustained the opposition and held that the applicant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schering & Glatz, Inc. v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. Rosengart v. Ostrex Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. William S. Merrell Co. v. Anacin Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. American Foundation for Dental ScienceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. Vitab Corp. v. Knox Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frito Co. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Frito Co. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  3. National Mineral Co. v. Norwich Pharmacal Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API