Legal Opinion

Mortgage Investment, Inc. v. Natal

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 4, 1935No. 32615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

Mortgage Investment, Inc., as the holder for value and before maturity, has brought suit against defendant, Dominick Natal, as indorser, to recover the balance of $4,500, with interest at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum from October 19,1929, until paid, and 10-per cent, attorney’s fees, alleged to he due on a promissory note.

The note sued upon is dated November 29,. 1920, and, originally, was in the sum of $6,000 due two years after date, is signed by Prank Prey Realty Company, Inc., by Dominick Natal, president, and Prank P. Prey, secretary-treasurer, and is indorsed by that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenda v. ZabriskieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
  2. Beck v. HowardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  3. Spurlin v. MillikinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Coffey v. CoffeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API