Legal Opinion

Lesk v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSwezey, J.

This is a motion to strike out the answer and to grant summary judgment in favor of plaintiff in each of the above-entitled actions. Heretofore, judgments were entered in favor of the plaintiffs against the Old Iron & Steel Corporation for damages as the result of an accident that occurred at five-fifteen p. M. on November 8, 1938. The plaintiffs in these actions are proceeding against the insurer, the defendant herein, pursuant to section 109 of the Insurance Law.

On January 25, 1938, the defendant herein issued its policy to the Old Iron & Steel Corporation. The term of this policy was from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Piscitello v. BoscarelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Rose Inn Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Gillette v. Utica Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Heckman v. SteinNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wagner & Erling Co. v. Fort Dearborn Casualty UnderwritersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lesk v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API