Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Spillane

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1894No. 596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Galveston.

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by James Spillane to recover of E. J. Marshall and F. P. Killeen the proceeds of the sale of one-half of lot 3, in block 55, in the town of Temple. It was shown that on March 6, 1883, Killeen being the owner of the entire lot, conveyed by a special warranty deed an undivided one-half thereof to the plaintiff. He had bought the lot from the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Eailway Company, and owed a balance of the purchase money thereon, which was evidenced by his promissory note. About January 1, 1891, Killeen conveyed the entire lot to E. J. Marshall,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boothe v. FiestTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Price v. LauveTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Crawford v. CarothersTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Thomson v. ShackelfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Warehouse Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Valdespino v. Dorrance & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Valdespino v. Dorrance & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API