Legal Opinion
Pullman Metal Specialty Co., Inc. v. Lang
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action was begun within four months prior to the beginning of bankruptcy proceedings, wherein the defendant was adjudicated a bankrupt. The defendant pleaded, and the court found as a fact, that in the bankruptcy proceedings the defendant made an offer of composition which the United States District Court confirmed. The confirmation of the offer of composition discharged the bankrupt from his debts. Section 14c of the Bankruptcy Act (30 U. S. Stat. at Large, p. 550); Collier on Bankruptcy (13th Ed.) Vol. 4, p. 3357, Id. Vol. 1, p. 460. The plaintiff therefore could not and did not claim…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Schunack v. Art Metal Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Van Zandt Jacobs & Co. v. SteiberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shawmut Bank v. Brooks Development Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- MANUFACTURERS'FINANCE CORPORATION v. Vye-Neill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Goodwin v. Boston Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
- J. E. Smith Company v. Dolores M. GuilletConnecticut Superior Court · 1948
- J. E. Smith & Co. v. GuilletPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1948