Legal Opinion

Walton v. Wilkins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1933No. 2235Published

1Opinion of the Court

HORNBECK, PJ.

The error claimed by Walton is based upon the following propositions:

1. Notice of the bankruptcy proceedings to The Ideal Laboratories Company will support a discharge of the debt evidenced by the trade acceptance held by The Davenport Morris Plan Bank and will, therefore, bar the claim of the solvent partner who was also liable on such debt.

2. That the defendant in error, Wilkins, had a provable debt or claim which he could have set up in the bankruptcy proceedings, such provable debt arising from the claim of The Davenport Morris Plan Bank,

The theory of Wilkins, defendant in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. In re HornsteinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
  4. In re StoutDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1900
  5. In re KufflerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API