In re Victor I.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), we find it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (see Penal Law § 195.05; Matter of Shaunise R., 40 AD3d 766 [2007]; Matter of Garrick B., 30 AD3d 217, 218 [2006]; Matter of Darnell C., 305 AD2d 405 [2003]). Moreover, in conducting an independent review of the weight of the evidence (cf. CPL 470.15 [5];…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Hasan C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Darnell C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Aaron P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Clarissa S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Kobe S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.