People v. Roshia
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, a sexual assault evidence kit was taken from the victim, and County Court’s order directing defendant to provide a DNA sample was authorized by statute (CPL 240.40 [2] [b] [v]). Accordingly, County Court did not err in granting the People’s application directing defendant to provide a buccal swab for testing.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- People v. KlugeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. ViewegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. TaddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.