Legal Opinion

People v. Roshia

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2016PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant was indicted by a grand jury, a sexual assault evidence kit was taken from the victim, and County Court’s order directing defendant to provide a DNA sample was authorized by statute (CPL 240.40 [2] [b] [v]). Accordingly, County Court did not err in granting the People’s application directing defendant to provide a buccal swab for testing.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. KlugeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. People v. ViewegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. People v. TaddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API