Legal Opinion

Chestnut v. Wells

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1925No. 11526. [fn*]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

Under and by virtue of the provisions of article 2817%, Rev. Statutes 1922 Supp. (article 2806, Rev. St. 1925), the county judge of Clay county ordered an election to be held on the same day in each of three common school districts situated in that county, designated as common school districts Nos. 36, 72, and 79, for the purpose of determining whether or not those districts should be consolidated for school purposes. The order so made was upon a petition of the required number of legally qualified voters of each of those districts, and was in all respects regular. In the election held in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallis v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hill v. Smithville Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Williams v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. CoffeeTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API