Legal Opinion

People v. Rosales

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1979No. Docket 62398PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The question before us is how far the permissible stop-and-frisk of Terry v Ohio1 extends in an automobile context. When the record does not show that the search was prompted by the officer’s fear of violence while pursuing his *626investigation, Terry v Ohio does not provide authority to validate the search without a warrant.

I

At roll call for his shift on June 10, 1976, Saginaw police officer Herzberg was told that a young black man, who had been arrested for the armed robbery of "after hours” drinking establishments in Saginaw, had escaped from the hospital where he apparently was receiving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. LongMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. ShankleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. DavenportMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. SizemoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. JenkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API