Legal Opinion

People v. Matthews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted and order entered November 19, 1993 (198 AD2d 847) vacated. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, i.e., whether defendant was present during the Sandoval conference. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of November 19, 1993 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see, People v Vasquez, 70 NY2d 1, rearg denied *97570 NY2d 748;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. LeFroisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API