Legal Opinion

O'Clair v. Hale

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Submission to the court on an agreed state of facts in the form of a motion, directing defendant to pay a lien claimed by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

Upon an agreed state of facts the parties submit to the court for the determination of their controversy the claim of the plaintiff to payment in full for a lien claimed upon the logs cut by him, and placed in the river for floatage to the mill of the company. His contract with the company was to cut, skid and draw the spruce logs upon certain sections of the township of Clifton, for which he was to receive $1.35 per 1,000 feet for cutting and skidding the logs and $1.40 per 1,000 feet for drawing and putting them upon the river. The logs were owned by the company under a stumpage contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burgett v. BissellNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brackett v. PiersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API