Broderick v. Archibald
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Camille E. Archibald, third party, from an order of the City Court of Yonkers, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 18th day of January, 1901, denying a motion for a modification of an order directing the said Camille E. Archibald to pay $150 to the receiver of the property of the judgment debtor, Merritt L. Archibald, by striking therefrom the provision directing such payment. ,
1DissentGoodrich, P. J.
I cannot" concur in the conclusion at which. my associates have arrived, and for these reasons:
It appears that among other moneys paid by the husband to the wife, she had received $150 in August, 1900. She testified that this money was paid to her as wages at $5 per week, for the preceding thirty weeks. • Afterward she testified that it was given to her as pin money. I think it fairly deducible from her testimony that she still has this money in her possession. The court appointed a receiver and directed Mrs. Archibald to pay that sum over to him. She appeals from the order, upon the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Krone v. KlotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Conger v. CoreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899