Legal Opinion

Ayala v. Berlin

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael D. Stallman, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner Iris Ayala challenges a determination dated October 9, 2009 of the Human Resources Administration that petitioner is not eligible to receive child care services.

Background

According to the petition, petitioner Iris Ayala is a single mother of three minor children who receives public assistance. Petitioner alleges that the Human Resources Administration (HRA) had been paying her child care expenses since 2008. Petitioner asserts that she has been énrolled as a student in a licensed practical nursing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Town of Orangetown v. MageeNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Scanlan v. Buffalo Public School SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Herberg v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ayala v. BerlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API