Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 3, 2001No. 5D99-1643Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

HARRIS, J.

Pursuant to the mandate in Brooks v. State, 787 So.2d 831 (Fla.2001), we reconsider our previous opinion, Brooks v. State, 753 So.2d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), in light of Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000), and reinstate Brooks’ habitual offender enhancement sentence.

COBB and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000