Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bee v. City of Huntington

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1933No. 7752Published

1Dissent

Maxwell, 1?Resident,

dissenting as to first two cases:

In the case of Finlayson v. City of Shinnston, 113 W. Va. 434, 168 S. E. 479, we held that levies for bonded indebtedness created subsequent to the adoption of the amendment of section 1, Article X, West Virginia Constitution, must be within the máximums prescribed by said amendment. Also, that levies for pre-existing bonded indebtedness must be made within the said máximums except where greater levies are necessary to prevent impairment of the obligations of contracts. The distinction between subsequent indebtedness and pre-existing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Grant v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Slack v. JacobWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Click v. ClickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State Road Commission v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API