Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Aracri, John Papandon, and Anthony Zummo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 30, 1992No. 178, 179 and 180, Dockets 91-1248, 91-1249 and 91-1267PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Joseph Aracri, John Papan-don and Anthony Zummo appeal from judgments of conviction entered after a jury trial before Wexler, J., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Defendants were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and of aiding and assisting in the preparation of fraudulent federal excise tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). Defendants make various claims of error. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and remand for consideration of whether…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.