Legal Opinion
Argue v. Hofmeyer
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2003No. 03-1156PublishedCited by 662 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Shannon Argue, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
By way of background, the record indicates that, following Argue’s transfer to E.C. Brooks Correctional Facility, the classification director (C.R. Starr) issued a program classification report indicating that Argue should be placed in school…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by662 opinions
- Flanory v. BonnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Green v. TudorDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- LaVergne v. StutesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Aaron Johnson v. Bryce Erickson, J. Edwards, S. Beckett, Vinson W., and M. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Abdias 836389 v. MacauleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
657 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.