Legal Opinion
Bollom v. Brunswick Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 30, 2021No. 0:18-cv-03105Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA PATRICK BOLLOM and COLLEEN BOLLOM, Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Civil File No. 18-3105 (MJD/HB) BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, a foreign corporation transacting business in the State of Minnesota d/b/a Sea Ray Boats, and MARINEMAX, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendants. Todd E. Gadtke, Gadtke Law Firm, P.A., and David M. Bolt, Bolt Hoffer Boyd, Counsel for Plaintiffs Anthony W. Finnell, Jr., and Daniel J. Connolly, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Counsel for Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.