James Bradford Co. v. Edward Hill's Son and Co.

We sustain the objection.

One M., chief clerk for Ellis Jackson and Company, and a witness for plaintiff, was asked on direct examination the following question:

*542“Do you know whether Edward Hill’s Son and Company, the defendant, treated the James Bradford Company, the plaintiff in this case, as its agent?”

Counsel for defendant objected, on the ground that the question called for a conclusion of law.

Heisel, J.

We sustain the .objection.

The shme witness was asked on direct examination the following question:

“Do you know whether Edward Hill’s Son and Company knew that the James Bradford Company was…