Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank v. Arkansas State Bank Commissioner

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1989No. 89-133Published

1Dissent

Darrell Hickman,

Justice, dissenting. I would not reach the constitutional questions in this case. Instead, I would reverse due to the fundamental failure of the commissioner to enter any findings of fact sufficient to support his order.

When we have reviewed administrative decisions, we have required strict compliance with a statute that requires underlying findings of fact. See First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. of Malvern v. Arkansas Savings & Loan Assoc. Bd., 257 Ark. 985, 521 S.W.2d 542 (1975); First State Bldg. & Loan Assoc. v. Arkansas Savings & Loan Bd., 257 Ark. 599, 518 S.W.2d 507…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n Board v. Central Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. First State Building & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Savings & Loan BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Malvern v. Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API