Legal Opinion

Sioux City Vinegar Manufacturing Co. v. Boddy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 23, 1899PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Gourt. — IIoN.' JOHN F. Oliveb, Judge. The demurrer to the petition' for new trial was sustained; and, as the plaintiff elected to stand on the ruling, the petition was dismissed, and it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

— In Boddy against the Sioux Oity Vinegar Manufacturing Company, judgment by default was entered against the defendant at the September, 1897, term of court; and, after its close, this petition for new trial, on the ground of unavoidable casualty or misfortune, preventing the company from defending, was filed. The demurrer, among other things, questioned the sufficiency of the facts alleged to constitute such casualty or misfortune as is contemplated by the statute. Oode, section 4091. The original notice was served pn the secretary of the corporation, who was not charged with *539any part in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Church v. J. F. Lacy & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Mogelberg v. ClevingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Grove v. BushSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Niagara Insurance v. RodeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Barto v. Sioux City Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Hobbs v. Martin Marietta CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Hueston v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. v. Morbern Industries Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Fred Andres & Co. v. SchlueterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API