Legal Opinion

Woodhaven Apartments v. Washington

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1997No. 960002PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

Woodhaven Apartments brought this action against Bertha Washington for actual and liquidated damages pursuant to their lease agreement after Washington vacated the apartment prior to the expiration of the lease. Washington appealed the trial court’s decision enforcing the liquidated damages provision. The court of appeals affirmed, and we granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals. Woodhaven Apartments v. Washington, 907 P.2d 271 (Ct.App.1995), cer t. granted, 920 P.2d 1194 (Utah 1996). We reverse.

BACKGROUND

Woodhaven Apartments and Bertha Washington…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Berneike v. CitiMortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  4. Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Commercial Real Estate Investment, L.C. v. Comcast of Utah II, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API