Legal Opinion

Peter Gottlieb v. Convergent Technologies, Peter Gottlieb, Roberta Gottlieb, Stanley Siedman v. Convergent Technologies, Peter Gottlieb, Roberta Gottlieb, Stanley Siedman, and Mark W. Gaffney v. Convergent Technologies

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 1991No. 90-15084Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

942 F.2d 791

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Peter GOTTLIEB, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant-Appellee.

Peter GOTTLIEB, Roberta Gottlieb, Stanley Siedman,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES, Defendant-Appellee.

Peter GOTTLIEB, Roberta Gottlieb, Stanley Siedman,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

Mark W. GAFFNEY, Appellant,

v.

CONVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re Apple Computer Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API