Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wicker v. Community Media Group

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1999No. 93A02-9904-EX-00296Published

1ConcurrenceMattingly, Judge

I concur in the majority’s result; however, I have serious reservations about our failure to require that.the Board, in this case, set out specific written findings of *601fact in support of its decision. I write separately to remind the Full Board that the majority’s decision does not obviate the need for specific written findings of fact.

Written findings of fact which support the Board’s decision are necessary so that “an appellate court may intelligently review the decision without speculating as to the agency’s rationale.” Wayman, 694 N.E.2d at 770. We have required that these findings of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. K-Mart Corp. v. MorrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Wayman v. J & S Petroleum, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API