Legal Opinion

In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02491Unknown

1Opinion

In the United States District Court for the District of Kansas In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation, Petitioners, v. Case No. 19-cv-2491-JAR-JPO (This Document Relates to All Cases) United States of America, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On August 20, 2020, one week before its deadline to comply with the Court’s July 27, 2020 order denying its request for a protective order, the government filed a Notice of Intent Not to Provide Further Discovery in these habeas proceedings.1 This matter is now before the Court on Petitioners’ Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 560) and Motion for Spoliation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API