Legal Opinion
Riddick v. Summit House, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1993No. 92 Civ. 2770 (VLB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
Plaintiff Lillian Riddick (“Riddick”), a tenant in a privately owned federally subsidized building, finds herself caught between regulatory requirements imposed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) concerning such buildings, and objections by the defendant owners and managers of the building (collectively “Summit”) that they never agreed to become subject to such requirements.
Summit contends that current HUD requirements are improper and hence has refused to sign agreements necessary for Rid-dick to continue to…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Costantini v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Fontaine v. RyanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Mareno v. Jet Aviation of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Trustees of the Hudson Valley District Council v. U.W. Marx, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994