Legal Opinion
City of Aurora v. Navar
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 8, 1991No. 2-90-0657PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
Plaintiff and counterdefendant, the City of Aurora (Aurora or City), appeals from orders of the circuit court of Kane County which permanently enjoined the City from enforcing its noise nuisance ordinance and awarded attorney fees to defendant and counterplaintiff, Juventino Navar (Navar).
Navar is the owner of Navar’s Auto Service, an auto repair garage, in the City of Aurora. Navar’s business is a permitted use under Aurora’s zoning ordinance. On September 25, 1989, Navar was contacted by Mark Anderson, the director of the division of inspections and permits for the City, and told to close…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Education, Pleasantdale School District No. 107 v. Village of Burr RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- City of Batavia v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- People Ex Rel. Klaeren v. Village of LisleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Halfway House v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- People ex rel. Klaeren v. Village of LisleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004