Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lewis v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 2010No. 3D09-294Published

1DissentRothenberg, J.

Because the record clearly establishes that a diligent search for service of process was not conducted by Fifth Third Mortgage Company, the default and final judgment of foreclosure entered against Ms. Lewis must be vacated. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

*162As the following record evidence was not provided in the majority opinion and it is essential to the legal analysis establishing why the judgment must be vacated, that evidence will be briefly addressed. Ms. Lewis, who purchased her home in 1996, faithfully and timely made all of her mortgage payments. In the summer of 2005, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shurman v. Atlantic Mortg. & Inv. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Ramagli Realty Co. v. CraverSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Garvin v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  5. ML Builders, Inc. v. Reserve Developers, LLPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API