Legal Opinion

Edrington v. Chenet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 2, 1912No. 19,655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson; E. K. Skinner, Judge ad hoc. Action by Prentice E. < Edrington against James V. Chenet. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were candidates for judge of the Twenty-Eighth judicial district court at the Democratic primary election held in that district September 3,1912. This case is similar in all respects to that of the case of Marrero v. Middleton et al., 131 La. 432, 59 South. 863, this day decided by us. There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Judge Edrington, and against the defendant, Judge Chenet, from which judgment derendant prosecutes this appeal.

Because of the great similarity in the two cases it becomes unnecessary for us to repeat what is said by us in the reasons for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marrero v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. AskewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Cambre v. BrignacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API