Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foster v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1977No. 46389Published

1DissentWilliams, Justice

I respectfully dissent to the opinion of the majority.

To my mind the two statutes there referred to, 59 O.S. 1971, § 1330 and 59 O.S. 1971, § 1326(b) are not mutually exclusive but rather by the Legislature were intended to form a composite.

I respectfully suggest the case of Russell v. State, Okl, 488 P.2d 1264 (1971) should be overruled. See dissenting opinion of Hodges, C. J., then V. C. J. in case of Foster v. State, Okl, 551 P.2d 1119, 1121 (1976).

Having become aware of what I believe to be the unlawful and harmful effect of the holding in Russell in that it denies a surety the right to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  2. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API