Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 10, 1920No. 6172Published

Appeal from District Court, Hamilton County; J. H. Arnold, Judge. Action by the W. T. Rawleigh Company against J. F. Marshall and others. From a Judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact.

JENKINS, J.

In 1912 and 1913, the ap-pellee J. F. Marshall entered into a contract with appellant for the sale of medicines and other articles manufactured by appellant, which contract was in violation of the antitrust laws of this state in these particulars: It required Marshall to devote his entire time to the business, to sell the goods at the prices fixed by appellant, and he was to have exclusive control of certain territory. In 1914, contracts of this nature having been held by the courts of this state to be void, the appellant entered into a new contract with appellee…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Mfg. Co. v. Skidmore Drug & Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API