Legal Opinion

Adams v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 13, 1978No. Docket Nos. 6976-74, 6977-74, 6978-74, 6979-74, 6980-74, 6981-74PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Subsequent to the filing of the opinion in the case of Adams v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 373 (1978), and upon its own motion, this Court directs that the parties therein submit briefs addressing the issue as to whether this Court has the statutory authority to determine a deficiency in tax under sec. 4941(b)(1), I.R.C. 1954.

1Opinion of the Court

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

Fay, Judge:

On May 30, 19.78, our Findings of Fact and Opinion1 were filed in this case (70 T.C. 373 (1978)), which, in part, sustained respondent’s determination that petitioner, was subject to a 5-percent excise tax individually and as transferee of Automatic Accounting Co., under section 4941(a)(1)2 for certain acts of self-dealing which occurred between a private foundation and petitioner and Automatic. Pursuant to the opinion, decisions in docket Nos. 6977-74, 6978-74,-and 6980-74 will be entered under Rule 155.

Respondent further asserted a deficiency in tax under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  3. Bendheim v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Menard, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
  3. Freedman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  4. Zabolotny v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  5. Adams v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API