Reynolds v. Infinity General Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentCarley, Presiding Justice
By failing to give full effect to longstanding precedent of this state and relying on inapplicable foreign authority, the majority erroneously holds that the purported notice of cancellation sent by Infinity was effective. Every time that a Georgia appellate court has considered the issue, it has declined to give effect to a notice which, like the one here, states that an insurance policy will be cancelled on a particular date unless premiums due are paid prior to that date. Because the notice in this case was conditional and equivocal, it *97could not constitute a valid notice of cancellation.
As…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Fisher ex rel. Kiniry v. Associated Underwriters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Chambers v. Washington National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- McNellis v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.