Legal Opinion
Hatch v. Tacoma Police Dept.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 27, 2001No. 26172-3-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 P.3d 1223 (2001)
Patricia HATCH, Appellant,
v.
TACOMA POLICE DEPARTMENT and City of Tacoma, Respondents.
No. 26172-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
July 27, 2001.
Jean P. Homan, Asst. City Atty., Tacoma, for respondents.
Thomas Douglas Dinwiddie, Dinwiddie & Landry, Tacoma, for appellant.
MORGAN, J.
Patricia Hatch (Hatch) claimed loss of consortium against the City of Tacoma. The City moved for dismissal under CR 12(b)(6), contending that no set of facts would warrant recovery. The trial court granted the motion, and Hatch appealed. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
On March 4,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Reichelt v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otani v. BroudyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- OTANI EX REL. SHIGAKI v. BroudyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Boeken v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Estate Of Carl Murray, Wendy Murray, V City Of VancouverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018