National Bank v. Carr
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action tried before Timberlake, J., at June (Special) Term, 1897, of Durham Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Faircloth, C. J.:
C. G. Holland made his promissory note payable to J. S. Carr and John W. Holland, and said payees endorsed said note for the accommodation of C. G. Holland and in the regular course of business said note became the property of the plaintiff, who brings this action against J. S. Carr alone. The defendant insisted that the administrator of C. G. Holland, and John W. Holland, and one Green to whom C. G. Holland had conveyed some property in trust to indemnify said John W. Holland against, loss by reason of said endorsement, should be made parties defendant before the plaintiff…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bank v. Carr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Castleberry v. . SasserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- McD. Ray v. LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- The Law Off. of Robert Forquer v. ArcuriCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025